[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
New key negotiations
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: New key negotiations
- From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:03:46 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:04:14 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=J7wlMxyMljSrJ8KwRnAqG/jMxigGi8I5RsD6QTjtj8uNIuhGNUm7NfMbXCJAN6VKpal/8RSa93h0K5eI/8AQg6nXKic30lg0vpQGF3uTv9OzhRq3nPMK5m/LCfoZa0K8WJq+ngtIGUdEj7r1XUVdBry/O7H9nS9dMcv9Af/o05I=
- Openpgp: url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x57C89443
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719)
Is it possible to change the key negotiation method in a
backwards-compatible way? I see no indication in the torspec.txt of this
being possible. So is the removal of an exponentiation by client and
server worth the price of a break with old clients and servers?
--
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security,
deserve neither liberty or security
--Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature