[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
From: Gitano <ran6oony7r9deku5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:48:20 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:48:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <4CA38336.8090105@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Private
References: <4CA38336.8090105@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8

On 2010-09-29 20:19, Matthew wrote:

>  I currently use Tor + Polipo + Torbutton + NoScript.
> 
> Obviously there are other add-ons for Firefox out there such as
> BetterPrivacy.

I think 'BetterPrivacy' is a "must"! [1]

> Are any other add-ons necessary or would people suggest I am now fully
> protected?

IMHO its important to suppress active content (Flash, ActiveX,
Silverlight, JavaScript etc.) and other junk and therefor I prefer
'Privoxy' [1] instead of Polipo.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Shared_Object
[2] http://www.privoxy.org/
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

References:
- BetterPrivacy - necessary?
  - From: Matthew

Prev by Author: Re: Privoxy doesn't start on booting
Next by Author: Re: Tor seems to have a huge security risk--please prove me wrong!
Previous by thread: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
Next by thread: Re: BetterPrivacy - necessary?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread