So 3.2 shouldn't have things made compatible with it because it doesn't have things that are compatible with it? Or am I missing something?RussellOn 7 June 2012 06:56, Ian Mallett <geometrian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jeffrey Welch <neutronjeff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can someone answer that?
What Pygame, if any, is compatible with 3.2 ?On the downloads page, it appears to exist for Windows, but not for Mac. ÂPerhaps someone else here knows more on the build state can elaborate, but as far as I know PyGame 3.2 for Mac doesn't yet exist?In my opinion, however, the world isn't ready for Python 3.2--not enough is compatible with it yet. ÂPython 2.7 is plenty powerful, methinks. ÂThanks,Ian