Re: WINE, SoftWindows, and other proprietary software ports

["Greg R. Nate" <greg@cs.pdx.edu>]

I'd pay $200 for it...Hell, I'd even donate $200 to the WINE cause if
it were organized in such a way.  I'm not one of the Linux freaks who is
against paying for anything...I just want what I pay for to actually work
- which M$ has yet been able to achieve.

G Nate


On Fri, 12 Jun 1998, Erik Walthinsen wrote:

> > I don't want it if it costs $200. Although it is cheaper than
> > NT it's not cheaper than Win95. -Jeff
> 
> That's fine, it's your decision.  While Windoze98 costs "only" $100, the 
> amount of money spent with other required crap is much higher.  When's the 
> last time you ran a heavily used machine more than a few months without 
> needing some tool that runs you another $100?  If you do, let me know and 
> I'll notify the Guinness ppl, they'll want to record that.
>