[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?

To: SEUL-EDU <seul-edu@seul.org>
Subject: Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?
From: rnd@onego.ru
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 13:54:26 +0300 (MSK)
Delivery-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 05:55:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20001127072951.23287.qmail@web614.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: seul-edu@seul.org
Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org

On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, [iso-8859-1] Andrew Goh wrote:

>which one to use.  KDE has a C/C++ suite called
>KDevelop which is still in beta, while GNOME doesn't
>seem to have except a powerful application framework.

What about Glade ?
It is C, C++, Perl, Python, ADA ... visual environment.

>So, from that point, you may be right to say KDE is
>better, more sophiscated, but much remains to be seen,
>because GNOME is much more organised.

IMHO, Gnome is nicer but KDE is said to be more stable and fast.
Gnome is also evolving faster.

Personally I dislike KDE, though.

Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
_/ Russia _/ Karelia _/ Petrozavodsk _/ rnd@onego.ru _/
_/ Monday, November 27, 2000 _/ Powered by Linux RedHat 6.2 _/
_/ "Postmen never die, they just loose their zip..." _/

References:
- Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?
  - From: Andrew Goh <agsm1@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?
Next by Date: [seul-edu] UK Schools Linux and Re:[Kde-edu]
Prev by thread: Re: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?
Next by thread: RE: [seul-edu] KDE or GNOME?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread