[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity
From: Philipp Winter <identity.function@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:34:23 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 07:34:47 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:x-pgp-fpr:user-agent; bh=EYxe8GEsgKehV2dseaoE+wUDeKXEbT/DlbS9ZUf/7a4=; b=zKp7C29u/pfm3o6TdbRNxuren/NG9nH6tEaWa0+CYo0+1czwNP5HMfibRAJ4glhxyc Du1xilCe5EZTb+rspvzTR5cIp8BCzG1gVXVcwMfQXnzkayi4eNrQuyQdyK78H86J9ekJ Tptq9HUfLEKjUwdzRoIcklmcCQGScpEqHeQnpxZvTAGHl5REntofmnqdDYH1AbcLlZYi j2Yz2Zh+rpB6POf5jFFH3AbBJ8GVTZDZzLH3YmZrOZHwPFC1aWOux4xY2sxnXwgsiGpZ Oq4pKzhGrCy9bE1dBnXW4HL+M1YhjxoQybBt3CEVNjek+G27+nPEuuZpCJ2Hx5c0OdIc ei9Q==
In-reply-to: <20130404043751.GC591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <515BDE7A.4000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130404043751.GC591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:51AM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> And do obfs3 bridge help that are run on IPs
> also used for regular relays?

Right now, it is important to get more obfs3 bridges for China since obfs2 no
longer works [0]. In general, it would be better to run bridges and relays on
separate IP addresses to defend against censors who simply blacklist all IP
addresses listed in the consensus. At least in China, however, it is currently
possible to run both on just one IP address since the GFW blocks Tor relays
based on IP:port tuples.

Cheers,
Philipp

[0] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8591
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity
  - From: Matt Joyce

References:
- [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity
  - From: Moritz Bartl
- Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity
  - From: Andreas Krey

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] Restart relay daily
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] How to limit number of sockets used?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread