[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] On the way to more diversity



On 05/04/13 12:34, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:37:51AM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
>> And do obfs3 bridge help that are run on IPs
>> also used for regular relays?
> Right now, it is important to get more obfs3 bridges for China since obfs2 no
> longer works [0]. In general, it would be better to run bridges and relays on
> separate IP addresses to defend against censors who simply blacklist all IP
> addresses listed in the consensus. At least in China, however, it is currently
> possible to run both on just one IP address since the GFW blocks Tor relays
> based on IP:port tuples.
>
> Cheers,
> Philipp
>
> [0] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8591
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I don't really know much about obsfproxy only heard about it a bit on
here but if the above is correct perhaps someone could direct me to some
useful info on how to go about setting up such, I'd be happy to add the
service on my 1Gbps relay at least to trial it out and then if demand is
high enough I'll look to acquire another address.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays