On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 02:35:49 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8/14/16, i3 <i3jm2y7yftyix4kobdra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the drives > > Depending on whether you meant MiB/s or MB/s, > you may find your network calculations off by 350Mbps, To me these seem to be just two loosely related facts, the latter merely supporting the notion that the network connection is capable of way more than 1Gbps. I don't see any "network calculations" being presented. > Standard use is decimal and bits for network "Mbps", > and binary and bytes for disk "MiB". "MB/s" is neither. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte: "The megabyte is a multiple of the unit byte for digital information. Its recommended unit symbol is MB." MB/s is a long-accepted shorthand for Megabyte per second, and yes, Mb/s is megabit per second. But please, take your "MiB" lunacy elsewhere. -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
pgpLBEvghU1qk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays