[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
From: Carlin Bingham <cb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 02:04:34 +1200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:04:51 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viennan.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=HCPCKmP9nkyTc4dTyuLZc1OZV6A=; b=IG+RJZ Wc8pKU39X9c3nxxgIVDvbXKx/OHvw673y150iE4gM7741NpwzkriCvR8PHqFOFl9 tYkQjA6oZ8FdFL1HqrQd+xbrnoVyyaa7UP0X3Z66liEzhwjYLC1+9HtWKv4fX+9Z Ol6EL/MEI5/E4N1O9/OODnaSSW58hZh6SdNkU=
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=HCPCKmP9nkyTc4d TyuLZc1OZV6A=; b=Z7IWN2QwGS5N4epOzNGCKpewrb0e6yh1v5DWGSyXalfQJpu u3D5LyfrwLVLISJiGyidHSpwsnZghmqnPawHtRC5wYQPax1zDx/hWxe3XVuXoURO 67Pet7eUiTpX8ivejMr8l7doKSIEHMIi80XKL/daB7BchjihxagSLWPQlU0I=
In-reply-to: <559BD326.6030306@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5591893B.5090003@xxxxxxxxxx> <55953DBF.2090407@xxxxxxxxxx> <6.2.5.6.2.20150702125334.07371240@xxxxxxxxxxx> <559ACBEE.90300@xxxxxxxxxx> <C28426E0-7269-4D21-B855-2FAF66756A10@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <559BD326.6030306@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I just want to chime in with my own consensus weight problem.

FF1678164E0FFF1DACA45E3DCDE16E49FF1374BE has been running for over 70
days and still has a consensus of 20, I don't think it has ever changed
since it was started.

Looking at the consensus it is unmeasured=1 by every authority.

Any ideas?


--
Carlin
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
  - From: Tom Ritter

References:
- Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
  - From: Speak Freely
- Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
  - From: starlight . 2015q2
- Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
  - From: Speak Freely
- Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
  - From: josh
- Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
  - From: Speak Freely

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays
Next by Author: [tor-relays] How to create HSDir on a private network
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread