Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

[Tom Ritter <tom@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7 July 2015 at 09:04, Carlin Bingham <cb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I just want to chime in with my own consensus weight problem.
>
> FF1678164E0FFF1DACA45E3DCDE16E49FF1374BE has been running for over 70
> days and still has a consensus of 20, I don't think it has ever changed
> since it was started.
>
> Looking at the consensus it is unmeasured=1 by every authority.
>
> Any ideas?

It's actually only unmeasured by two:
http://131.188.40.189/tor/status-vote/current/authority (gabelmoo)
http://199.254.238.52/tor/status-vote/current/authority (longclaw)

The other two have measured it:
http://171.25.193.9:443/tor/status-vote/current/authority (maatuska, 330)
http://128.31.0.34:9131/tor/status-vote/current/authority (moria, 325)

-tom
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays