Hi Teor & Others,
Thanks for your response,
On 2 Mar 2018, at 23:26, teor wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2018, at 02:15, Stijn Jonker <sjcjonker@xxxxxx> wrote:
On 2 Mar 2018, at 12:08, Vasilis wrote:
Hi,
Roger Dingledine:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 06:47:00PM +0000, nusenu wrote:
if your relays behave strangely in terms of bandwidth seen, than this
might be due to the fact that there are less than 3 bw auth votes available.
If you run a fast relay it is capped to 10k cw.
This affects currently the 857 fastest relays.
Yep! We had 4 running, but 2 of them had problems, and we need 3
for the authorities to want to use the values from them.
Perhaps it makes sense to do a call and add some more bandwidth authority relays
during the upcoming meeting in Rome similar to the Montreal meeting.
Would the following documents still be valid (They themselves state they might be outdated)?
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/BandwidthAuthority
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/BandwidthAuthorityMeasurements
Also what bandwidth should an bwauth have available itself?
I can see if I can support by running one, although it will be EU based.
You need a directory authority to vote on your bandwidth authority's output.
Do you know what is the best way to get these vote(s), i.e. who to approach; as these kind of things are still a mystery with the Tor project for me. From a personal believe happy to assist, have reasonable spare CPU/Mem and Bandwidth available. So that should't be an huge issue. I know a thing or two about running systems so to say..
Bandwidth authorities measure relay capacity. Then they send their results to a
directory authority, and the directory authority puts the results in its vote. The
directory authority votes change the consensus weights of relays.
If your bandwidth authority isn't used for voting or testing, it's just wasting
bandwidth.
If you want to test and contribute code to a new bandwidth authority
implementation, I'd recommend:
https://github.com/TheTorProject/bwscanner
Thanks I found the TorFlow repo; that feels a bit hacked, but if either do the job and the above Q can be answered then happy to (try and) set it up.
But you'll need to change the default bandwidth server config, due to the
tor project DDoS.
I assume that can be shared in a more private setting then.
Stijn
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays