[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike




On 09/01/2016 01:47 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On 8/31/16, Kenneth Freeman <kencf0618@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> To me it seems to be a bit late in the day for a Cambrian
>> Explosion -let a thousand anonymity networks bloom and see where it gets
>> you.
> 
> I wouldn't say that. So long as any particular network is
> incapable or insufficient at resisting certain adversaries...
> or any of its models on the people or other sides of things
> are non ideal, or it just doesn't do what its users need it to
> do, there's in fact every expectation that other networks
> should and will bloom up. 1000? No of course not. Yet a
> handful of similar nets based on some feature chart... sure.

I was riffing a bit on Mao's infamous Hundred Flowers Campaign. "The
policy of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of
thought contend is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and
the progress of science." Depends on your threat model, I suppose.

Attachment: 0xDD79757F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays