[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Tor and Diplomatic Immunity



Couldn't they run a regular relay node instead? This would help them blend in their traffic so to speak while also not having to put themselves at risk of being cut off.

On 6 September 2016 04:47:41 BST, Dave Warren <davew@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 11:24, Kenneth Freeman wrote:


On 09/04/2016 07:31 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 09/04/2016 09:11 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have been
done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a match
made in Heaven.

Well, they need uplinks, right? I doubt that diplomatic immunity forces
ISPs to serve them. Private routing is possible, of course, but is
probably too expensive for most.

Whatever their budgetary considerations, embassies and consulates afford
diplomatic safe spaces for Tor nodes.

At best, they provide a *legal* safe space, but it would only take an
embassy having their local internet access terminated once or twice
before they'd re-consider, absent any agreements which block service
providers from doing such. I'd be surprise if such exist, although, it's
certainly possible.

Assuming we're talking exit nodes, anyway.





tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays