> I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a > global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and > organizations clearly aspire to be one. Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not aspire to be passive. Or perhaps you simply typed the word "passive" by shear force of habit and instead meant to convey "suffiently global adversary". :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays