[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bos-dev] accessors of BW
- To: bos-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [bos-dev] accessors of BW
- From: "Charles Clercq" <charles.clercq@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:27:48 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: bos-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: bos-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:28:18 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=uQ8YYOIdUCG5jBqmmFNHwzZBsTFWnBOhnzNJwu1wHc4=; b=ANhs5shGRwao5adARXWSoZnuBDQ/fLHFdZryUDN5KDQkQbPegEIQCRJLV2ZmChNYTMtxYwPaplpoOmArOb9bItYZsi+1jO1MVwuVexoSdedx534HOHZs6JUW6/cGYVD8BVyA5eck6amaeGapR6Hj38EV15JA6PwdgAUApXSysTk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hEFAhkLzd/jcBkEkLrgodUDangGA+Yp+ktSoHodqtGNBl17hZlbb48IavuefTDa9/aH+OpKoJ5Tfzu4CBzLlCheFVVQtb8Aygkkt75F3SuGELusT8l9Bdkswh8c5SnUPvnjHUQ4TQ+0+bkRF8sup/H4vnRRUVfJKym2Rblq1JoM=
- In-reply-to: <394449.28802.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <394449.28802.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: bos-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-bos-dev@xxxxxxxx
Thanks for your responses.
I wonder whether another solution wouldn't be to use luaSocket. If I have to "modify" the code, I think the solution of socket would be better than the use of file which could "create" some problem of synchronization ... What do you think about that ?