On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 02:56:23AM -0700, Steve Paynter wrote: > --- Daniel Stone <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:04:49PM +0930, David Lloyd wrote: > > > In times like this a complete change of committee and faces can occur, > > > but there are too many entrenched positions to do that. > > > > Note here that a majority of the committee agreed in-principle to a > > motion of no-confidence in ... the committee. > > Wow, this is a startling claim. (Was there follow-up? I missed it.) > More info please. Was the above discussed in a public forum? > Are you suggesting such a motion is pending? No, it stemmed from several private discussions. > > It's pretty rare, and > > probably quite a bad sign, to see a group passing no-confidence in > > *itself*. > > Not necessarily. Better to dissolve and start again than > continue dysfunctionally. Think NRMA, Coles Myer, RMIT, HIH, One.Tel... > (Err, not suggesting CAI Committee is dysfunctional, but I honestly > can't recall the last time I heard from them in this forum, or any > other I'm on.) Well, it wouldn't be the least sane assertion to make ... -- Daniel Stone <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au> <dstone@kde.org> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
Attachment:
pgp00009.pgp
Description: PGP signature