[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Computerbank] Recipients vs Service Users

To: computerbank <computerbank@lists.linux.org.au>
Subject: Re: [Computerbank] Recipients vs Service Users
From: Bruce McCubbery <brucemcc@melbpc.org.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:21:05 +1100
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 23:10:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3C955059.7060800@projectx.com.au>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux.org.au/archives/computerbank/>
List-Help: <mailto:computerbank-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=help>
List-Id: The Computerbank Project -- see http://www.computerbank.org.au/ <computerbank.lists.linux.org.au>
List-Post: <mailto:computerbank@lists.linux.org.au>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/computerbank>,<mailto:computerbank-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/computerbank>,<mailto:computerbank-request@lists.linux.org.au?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: computerbank-admin@lists.linux.org.au


The term being replaced has always been a no no with me, I use "clients".

Bruce

At 13:26 18/03/02 +1100, Kylie Davies wrote:
>With this in mind I want to use something a little less loaded to 
>describe our clients (and that's not the word I'm looking for), the one 
>I propose is SERVICE USERS.


_______________________________________________
computerbank mailing list
computerbank@lists.linux.org.au
http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/computerbank

References:
- [Computerbank] Recipients vs Service Users
  - From: Kylie Davies <kylied@projectx.com.au>

Prev by Date: [Computerbank] Recipients vs Service Users
Next by Date: RE: [Computerbank] Recipients vs Service Users
Prev by thread: [Computerbank] Recipients vs Service Users
Next by thread: [Computerbank] Re: [CAI-committee] Recipients vs Service Users
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread