[Computerbank] Re: [CAI-committee] Recipients vs Service Users

[Da Moose <moose@bovine.artificial-stupidity.net>]

hi

doesn't recipients just imply those who recieve?

we could be really radical and just call them people

Pen

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Kylie Davies wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Why not throw in a curly unrelated question on this list - maybe it is 
> going to come up at the national conference as a policy anyhow, thought 
> I'd get it in early.
> 
> I've alwasy hated the term recipients, it has negative implications - ie 
> that you are the receiver of something that someone decides to give you.
> 
> With this in mind I want to use something a little less loaded to 
> describe our clients (and that's not the word I'm looking for), the one 
> I propose is SERVICE USERS. 
> 
> What does everyone else think about that?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Kylie
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cai-committee mailing list
> cai-committee@lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/cai-committee
> 


_______________________________________________
computerbank mailing list
computerbank@lists.linux.org.au
http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/computerbank