Re: Victory Conditions

[Chang <brain13homepage@pchome.com.tw>]

On Wen, 2004-03-10 02:19, Jens Granseuer wrote：
> On 09.03.2004 00:32, Dave Fancella wrote:
> > I'd call it a marginal victory, maybe, since you could 
> > say "Well, they still had a presence and your base was undefended, so they 
> > still won".
> > 
> > So, is this a bug, or a user error?  ;)  (Sore loser, maybe?)
> 
> If you have no units left, he can just smash his tanks against the
> walls until he has a door that's big enough. He doesn't need any
> infantry. (So, yes, I consider this behaviour to be correct. I don't
> know if Yen did this intentionally but I wouldn't want to change it.
> No cheap victories!)

Oh, not intentionally, but seems quite reasonable for it to be existed, 
now.

In fact, I had never considered such a situtation, but what Jens has 
mentioned is right, tanks should be able to take over a city, although
not as fast as the infantrys.

Brain



==========================================================
 PChome¥æ¤Í~~©¯ºÖ¤Ñ¤Ñ¦³ \*^o^*//
 http://love.pchome.com.tw/
==========================================================