[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: CoMET vs. cfed incompatibility with HAVE_CRYSTALS

To: crimson-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CoMET vs. cfed incompatibility with HAVE_CRYSTALS
From: Jens Granseuer <jensgr@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:18:32 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: crimson-users@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:22:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <op.swyoirwxohsavb@foxie.house> (from krivulcik@gmail.com on Mon Sep 12 01:21:53 2005)
Reply-to: crimson-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-crimson-users@xxxxxxxx

On 12.09.2005 01:21, Andrej Krivulčík wrote:
> The recently finished third tutorial mission is causing cfed some problems.

Should now be fixed in CVS, as should the bogus line numbers being reported
when blank lines are missing.

Thanks for catching.

I'll try to finish the tutorial messages during the next days, and then
we should finally be good to go for 0.4.9.

Jens

References:
- CoMET vs. cfed incompatibility with HAVE_CRYSTALS
  - From: Andrej Krivulčík

Prev by Author: Update for Tutorial1
Next by Author: Re: Third tutorial map
Previous by thread: CoMET vs. cfed incompatibility with HAVE_CRYSTALS
Next by thread: cfed feature/bug
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread