[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?

To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
Subject: Re: [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
From: "Marco Al" <marco@simplex.nl>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 23:38:44 +0100
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 17:38:40 -0500
References: <200203012327.0dec@th00.opsion.fr> <3C8025D4.86B47163@f-cpu.org> <20020302124910.23541@thrai.stud.uni-hannover.de> <000901c1c2a1$991e2f60$0dddc2d4@ifurita> <001e01c1c2d4$0726c080$bca45982@student.utwente.nl> <20020303204153.GA3206@storm.local> <002601c1c2fc$c5dd5b10$bca45982@student.utwente.nl>
Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org

From: "Marco Al" <marco@simplex.nl>

> From: "Andreas Bombe"
>
> > It would mean that all executables (not only shared libraries) would
> > have to be position independent code.
>
> Small loss, but if its really a problem segments provide an alternative
> solution.

Hell, come to think of it the loader could just rewrite them during start
up.

Marco




*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

References:
- Rep:Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: "Nicolas Boulay" <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: Yann Guidon <whygee@f-cpu.org>
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: "Christophe" <christophe.avoinne@laposte.net>
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: "Marco Al" <marco@simplex.nl>
- [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: Andreas Bombe <bombe@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- Re: [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
  - From: "Marco Al" <marco@simplex.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Next by Date: Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Prev by thread: Re: [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Next by thread: [f-cpu] Re: Rep:Re: virtually or physically-addressed cache ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread