[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[f-cpu] question to shifting unit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Erm, why we use parallel shifting than
use registers/acummulation instead?
I see, that a shift of 3 or more needs more cycles than parallel-shifting,
but often we need a shift of one or two.
Is it not possible to use that shifts on registerbank directly? We have
then an additional unit free for other operations.
Or is it too worse and too complex?
Bye Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7xGhcClxplZklbgERAnkIAJ40FXxgT7aBGreSN3Od3/0hQE38lgCfcHAM
OOYOQ/assUYsMZlxJ0qdIrQ=
=2iq8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/