Attached is the minimum schematic that generates the syntax error. Just a bunch of identical capacitors (except refdes) and 2 chips.Removing ANY one of those components make the error go away, so it's most likely memory corruption issue.
The .sch file looks right to me, so I'm leaning towards gsch2pcb. However, valgrind doesn't report any memory access problems, and the code is a pain to read (unusual indentation style...). I'll keep looking.
Attached are the sch and corresponding pcb. I don't see any error in the .sch, but the pcb file is clearly corrupted near the very end.
Matthew Matthew Lai wrote:
I didn't get to load the netlist, so I'm assuming it's unrelated to gnetlist output?My design uses mostly m4 footprints, so I'm trying to avoid having to replace them all if possible.Thanks kai-martin knaak wrote:Matthew Lai wrote:None of my footprint files have "-" (dash) in their file name.It has been suggested, that space " " in footprint names may confuse gnetlist, too. Did you try the option "--skip-m4" to not use the m4 library at all?--<)kaimartin(>---_______________________________________________ geda-bug mailing list geda-bug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-bug
Attachment:
board.pcb
Description: application/pcb-layout
Attachment:
scope.sch
Description: application/vnd.cadsoft.eagle.schematic
_______________________________________________ geda-bug mailing list geda-bug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-bug