[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB postscript output space

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB postscript output space
From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:19:02 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:57:29 -0400
In-reply-to: <200604192224.k3JMOM7t017259@envy.delorie.com>
References: <20060419214155.GA10568@kestrel> <200604192224.k3JMOM7t017259@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:24:22PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > I suggest to use CIEbasedA space instead which is device
> > independent.
> 
> The use of CIE color spaces is incompatible with our desire to be
> compatible with Level 1 postscript devices.

Are you sure? I got an impression from the PS spec that only images are
not allowed to use CIE in L1, but other primitives can use.

CL<

References:
- gEDA-user: PCB postscript output space
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB postscript output space
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB postscript output space
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB postscript output space
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread