Re: gEDA-user: Gnucap crash

[al davis <ad136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 12 April 2007 09:37, Patrick Doyle wrote:
> ok... no problem.  The only reason I did it before was
> because that was the way the spice-sdb backend to gnetlist
> embedded simulation commands in the schematic.  It probably
> has to do with where the simulation command shows up in the
> schematic file.
>
> Since I found that to be confusing when I first saw it, (not
> being aware of how spice operated), and since it is not
> likely to be the right thing for newbies to do I'll take a
> look at spice-sdb and see if there is a way to sort the
> output so that embedded simulation commands come out at the
> end.  (Hmmm.... now that I think about it, I seem to recall a
> "sort things so that gnucap is happy" option that already
> exists for spice-sdb.)  Of course, since Stuart reads this
> list, he'll probably jump in, change the single line of code
> that needs to be changed, and issue a patch before I even
> finish drinking my Diet Pepsi this morning.  :-)

There is a switch, supposedly, "-s".  I never use it because I 
don't put simulation commands in a schematic.

Don't worry about it.  There are big changes happening in 
gnucap, and in a month or two it won't matter.  There are 
bigger issues than this one.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user