Re: gEDA-user: refdes_renum changes, anybody?

[Steve Morss <smorss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I vote for gentle, too.  If this is a problem, it would be better if the 
renum came back and said something like "Are you sure you want to 
renumber all of your refdeses (this will destroy your current 
assignments)?".  In general, if a tool is going to delete a bunch of 
existing work, it's always nice to ask the user first.

Thanks for putting this in,
Steve


Dan McMahill wrote:
> Stuart Brorson wrote:
> > Thanks!  That's three votes for --gentle by default.
> >
> > Anybody object to this default?  Otherwise I'll change the default
> > behavior tonight (if I can carve out time).
> >
> > Stuart
>
> for the record, I also like "gentle" by default and a different option 
> that forces a complete renumbering.
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user