Re: gEDA-user: refdes_renum changes, anybody?

[Stuart Brorson <sdb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Guys --

That's maybe six or seven votes in favor of making --gentle the
default behavior for refdes_renum.  Thanks!

I just updated refdes_renum in CVS.  It now implements the --gentle
option by default.  I also modified Dan's spiffy new test suite to
account for this difference in behavior.

Please give it a whirl, and let me know if you find any bugs/problems.

Stuart


On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Steve Morss wrote:

> I vote for gentle, too.  If this is a problem, it would be better if the 
> renum came back and said something like "Are you sure you want to renumber 
> all of your refdeses (this will destroy your current assignments)?".  In 
> general, if a tool is going to delete a bunch of existing work, it's always 
> nice to ask the user first.
>
> Thanks for putting this in,
> Steve
>
>
> Dan McMahill wrote:
> > Stuart Brorson wrote:
> > > Thanks!  That's three votes for --gentle by default.
> > >
> > > Anybody object to this default?  Otherwise I'll change the default
> > > behavior tonight (if I can carve out time).
> > >
> > > Stuart
> >
> > for the record, I also like "gentle" by default and a different option that 
> > forces a complete renumbering.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geda-user mailing list
> > geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user