Re: gEDA-user: Symbols/Footprints with internally connected pins

["Steven Michalske" <smichalske@xxxxxxxxx>]

this is a feature should be built into the core of the footprints, as
not all pins need to be connected,  it would be nice to have the
ability to specify that a net list has options

connect to either pin 1 or pin 2 and either exclusively or inclusively.

just a thought on this topic.

Steve

On 4/22/07, John Luciani <jluciani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4/22/07, Peter Clifton <pcjc2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 12:11 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > >
> > > How can I handle this? Is there a way to generate a footprint with
> > > internally connected pins?
> >
> > I believe you can just make the footprint as usual, but instead of
> > numbering the pins uniquely, you assign the connected ones the same
> > number.
>
> Peter is correct. I do this all the time. It is especially useful when
> you need to
> overlay a pin and a pad.
>
> (* jcl *)
>
>
> --
> http://www.luciani.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user