Re: gEDA-user: Symbol analog/npn-2.sym wrong

[Karl Edler <kte608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is just a vague wish but wouldn't it be nice to have places for checked 
symbols and footprints? There could be one place for lightweight symbols, 
another for heavyweight ones. Perhaps a tree where symbols that have been 
checked according to different criteria could be placed and marked "checked".

I don't expect that there are more than 5 or 6 different opinions about what a 
symbol should be and how it should be checked. Eventually it would be nice if 
the symbols that are growing organically would be placed in such a tree with 
a short description of the motivation for each branch.

Although this would be nice the big list o symbols at gedasymbols.org is 
working just fine for me now.

Karl


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user