[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Symbol analog/npn-2.sym wrong

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:14:58 -0400, Karl Edler wrote:

> This is just a vague wish but wouldn't it be nice to have places for
> checked symbols and footprints?

Methinks, gedasymbols.org is a good start. With a few additional features 
and a bunch of user contribution it may develop into the kind of resource 
you envisage: Imagine, users were allowed to "sign" specific symbols of 
other authors as "tested". This would introduce some kind of peer review. 

On a different track, there might be several sets of design rules on the 
site. Users would mark symbols or footprints as conforming with a 
specific rule set.  

---<(kaimartin)>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
http://lilalaser.de/blog



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user