[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: A little puzzled about the purpose of gschem
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:46:41 -0400, al davis wrote:
> Suppose you had instead said:
> ===============
>> .......... I suggest
>> using Eagle through Darwine. In my personal experience, Eagle is a lot
>> better than geda, and
>> it is definitely an easier workflow.
> ===============
>
> Is this any different?
Yes it is.
Unlike ltspice eagle is inferior to gschem in many relevant ways. Most
notably it's GUI is a real PITA, in particular to newbies. Thus such an
advice probably would not help the OP with his project.
Unfortunately, the opposite is true for gschem/gnucap vs ltspice. If you
suggest otherwise to the inexperienced newbie, he or she will find out
the hard way and never come back.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
UniversitÃt Hannover, Inst. fÃr Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user