Re: gEDA-user: A little puzzled about the purpose of gschem

[Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:46:41 -0400, al davis wrote:

> Suppose you had instead said:
> ===============
>> .......... I suggest
>>  using Eagle through Darwine. In my personal experience, Eagle is a lot
>>  better than geda, and
>>  it is definitely an easier workflow.
> ===============
> 
> Is this any different?

Yes it is. 
Unlike ltspice eagle is inferior to gschem in many relevant ways. Most 
notably it's GUI is a real PITA, in particular to newbies. Thus such an 
advice probably would not help the OP with his project. 

Unfortunately, the opposite is true for gschem/gnucap vs ltspice. If you 
suggest otherwise to the inexperienced newbie, he or she will find out 
the hard way and never come back.

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak                                  tel: +49-511-762-2895
UniversitÃt Hannover, Inst. fÃr Quantenoptik      fax: +49-511-762-2211	
Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover           http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
GPG key:    http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user