[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Missing generic QFP64 form gEDA PCB library
As I said, select "QFP menu, generic" from the ~generic library. That
will give you a QFP builder. I agree that expanding the geda library is
a very good thing though. Just a question of time to add to it with
very careful checking.
-Dan
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 16:30:29 +0200
Olof Tångrot <olof.tangrot@biologigrand.ac> wrote:
> Hi there.
> Dan, I cannot find a QFP64 pattern in the library you indicate, nor
> does the library source of ~generic currently in the SourceForge
> CVS-repository contain such a pattern.
>
> Everyone:
> Even if I have found the pattern I still would be missing it form the
> gEDA library. I belive patten quality and coverage of the generic
> library support would improve if the number of different libraries
> claiming to implementing the same pattern or classes of patterns where
> minimised. That would also make the program much easier to work with.
> I might be wrong about the gEDA library being that unified library but
> than tell me which library to use and whom to notify change requests
> to.
>
> Olof
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan McMahill" <dan@mcmahill.net>
> To: <geda-user@seul.org>
> Cc: <olof.tangrot@biologigrand.ac>
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 11:40 AM
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Missing generic QFP64 form gEDA PCB library
>
>
>
> try library ~generic, and select "QFP menu, generic". If I were you
> I'd do some sanity checks on the result (I have no reason to think its
> wrong, but you should anyway)
>
> -Dan
>
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 11:27:30 +0200
> Olof Tångrot <olof.tangrot@biologigrand.ac> wrote:
>
> > I miss a generic QFP64 pattern from the gEDA-library that is shipped
> > with the current PCB snapshot. The source file says that it is
> > autogenerated but from where is it generated and who is responsible
> > for fixing updating the real source?
> >
> > (FYI, I have tried to make a bug report at the PCB SourceForge
> > repository but have not been given any feedback to that.)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Olof
>
>
> --
>
--