[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: QFP footprint naming conventions

To: geda-user@seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire@neurotica.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:54:15 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:54:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <251F0FE6-D805-11D7-92F8-003065D0A7C0@klebsch.de>
Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org

On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 04:37 PM, Mario Klebsch wrote:

I believe T is for thin, and L is for leadless.

JG

On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 06:45, Dan McMahill wrote:

  The QFP part is Quad Flat Package, but I'm not sure
about the T and L.

But what about VQFP ?

  "Very-proprietarily-named Quad Flat Package". ;)

        -Dave

--
Dave McGuire                 "You don't have Vaseline in Canada?"
St. Petersburg, FL                     -Bill Bradford

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions
  - From: Bob Paddock <bpaddock@csonline.net>

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions
  - From: Mario Klebsch <mario@klebsch.de>

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions
Next by Author: gEDA-user: symbol creation document?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread

Re: gEDA-user: *QFP* footprint naming conventions

Re: gEDA-user: QFP footprint naming conventions