Re: gEDA-user: Bourns 3386P footprint

[kai-martin knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Griffith wrote:

> I think I got it right, but would someone please double-check this
> footprint for a Bourns 3386P trimpot for me?  See
> 
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/david_griffith/footprints/POT_BOURNS_3386P.fp
> 

* The position of pins looks ok. Their numbers differ from the numbers in 
the data sheet. Is this deliberate? 

* I'd make the annular ring larger to facilitate manual soldering. 80 mils 
seems like a decent size to me. If the annular ring is a handicap for the 
layout, they con be shrunken as needed.  

* The outline of your footprint is a bit larger than the real component. 

---<)kaimartin(>---
-- 
Kai-Martin Knaak
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user