[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion
From: sdb@xxxxxxxxxx (Stuart Brorson)
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:00:51 -0500 (EST)
Cc: geda-bug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sdb@xxxxxxxxxx (Stuart Brorson)
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:00:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <EFB9F687-4B5D-4711-B462-3841AECC1972@wispertel.net> from "John Doty" at Dec 26, 2005 03:50:36 PM
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

Oh oh.  Sounds like a bug.  I never anticipated more than 9 pins, or
at least never thought about doing anything more than a stupid string
comparison.  

I'll see about fixing it and sticking the fix into CVS.  Thanks for the
bug report.

Stuart


> 
> Stuart,
> 
> The ordering of "SUBCKT IO Pin" connections on the .SUBCKT line  
> apparently depends on *textual* ordering of the refdes attributes.  
> This gets a bit confusing for more than 9 pins: P10 winds up between  
> P1 and P2!
> 
> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion
  - From: Al Davis

References:
- gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion
  - From: John Doty

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: gsch2pcb sources
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: spice-sdb connection order confusion
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread