Re: gEDA-user: PCB & Gschem

[Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:54:31AM +0100, Leva wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:08:38 +0000
> Marc Price <mark.price13@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > SMD & Through hole should be seperated for starters
> > 
> > And im having a break now cos im totally pissed off with geda.
> 
> Hey! You have to read the manual. You won't succeed with any other sofware too. For example, CERN pays thousends of CHFs for Cadence courses. Open source is different. You have all the documentation, you have to read it yourself. No one will come and teach you, AND it cost nothing. Think it over.
> 
> gEDA is a professional tool. Each professional tool is complicated.
> There's NO other way!

The problem is not in complication. Modern car is highly complicated and
it can be handled by person with little knowledge. The problem of gEDA
is lack of usability, ergonomy and all that scientific crap about
human-something interface

CL<

> 
> 
> Levente
> 
> -- 
> 
> E-Mail: lekovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> AIM: ha5ogl
> ICQ: 48710903
> MSN: ha5ogl@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Yahoo!: kieg_tk16
> Home Page: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs
> Public key: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs/cuccok/public_key
> 
> ________________________________________
> 
> /"\
> \ /    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
>  X   against HTML email & vCards
> / \     http://arc.pasp.de/
> 
> Have Fun, & Linux! 73 for all by HA5OGL.
> This message was generated by Sylpheed.