[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
gEDA-user: Check for attribute conflict does not play nice with multi part symbols
With gnetlist 1.7.0 (g9b9080e) a new check for attribute sanity seems
to be in place. Unfortunately, it does not play nice with multi part
symbols. For each of my opamps, that have a separate power symbol I get:
/----------------------------
Possible attribute conflict for refdes: U7
name: value
values: (LMH6609 #f)
Possible attribute conflict for refdes: U7
name: footprint
values: (SO8 #f)
\----------------------------
However, the power symbol does not contain a value attribute, or
a footprint attribute at all. I guess, this is what the "#f" is
trying to tell. It would be nice, if the sanity check would recognize
that this is not a possible conflict but perfectly acceptable.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user