[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gEDA-user: Some ideas on gEDA - please comment
- To: geda-user@geda.seul.org
- Subject: gEDA-user: Some ideas on gEDA - please comment
- From: stap@dse.nl (Jan Stap)
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 01:35:26 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@moria.seul.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:35:37 -0500
- Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Hello,
I am using gschem for about a week now since I just started a small
electronics project. I really like it - it works as easily as the Orcad
program that I used some years ago. But to the point now.
Since I use some components that are not in the symbols library yet,
I have drawn those after reading the relevant docs on the gEDA home page.
Doing so, these questions/ideas popped up:
- I see no standard way of adding the author name and email to a
just created symbol (I guess some specific attributes would do the
trick; possibly the auth= one mentioned below). Adding this info
could help communication on using the symbol, finding out why it
has / doesn't have power pins, etc.
- When I upload a symbol at
http://www.geda.seul.org/symlibrary/upload.html
and later on find an error in it, what happens if I upload it again?
In other words: are the uploaded symbols being version-controlled
via CVS or otherwise? (CVS would be preferable I think). A
version attribute could be of use.
The sym/titleblock/cvstitleblock-1.sym file holds the date=, rev=,
auth= and fname= attributes, using the corresponding CVS tags, but
those attributes don't appear in the Master Attribute Document at
http://www.geda.seul.org/docs/20021103/attributes/index.html
(so are these legal?).
- A "live" symbol tree at the gEDA web site would be something
worthwhile to have I think. I.e. uploaded symbols being available
to everyone instantly. If the upload code does a gsymcheck
(it probably already does), this should prevent polution of such a
tree. Having said this - gsymcheck (20021103 version) is more
liberal than the conventions given in the Symbol Creation Document at
http://www.geda.seul.org/docs/20021103/symbols/index.html
So maybe a more strict checking would be required before such a tree
could be provided at the gEDA site.
Excuse me if I bring up old issues here - Google does not seem to
index the lists (at least the user list which I tried to search).
Please comment!
Thanks,
Jan Stap
stap@dse.nl