[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: SOT23

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
From: Daniel J Wisehart <dw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 07:07:03 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:08:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050111133919.GF504@bondage.mcmahill.net>
References: <ad9f7823050111001457cdb802@mail.gmail.com> <20050111133919.GF504@bondage.mcmahill.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

On Tuesday 11 January 2005 05:39, Dan McMahill wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 12:14:40AM -0800, Matt Ettus wrote:
> > Is there a SOT23-5 footprint somewhere in PCB?  And does anyone have a
> > mapping between SOTxx and SCxx numbers?
>
> There are some SOT and SC footprints in ~geda.  Especially with these,
> you really really really (I can't stress it enough) want to verify
> the footprint before using them.  This is because I know of at least
> 2 different ways the pins on a SOT23-3 are numbered by different
> vendors.

I agree with that.  We used the SOT23-5 footprint and it was wrong for our 
part, so we had to glue the parts on upside down on our prototype. :-(

Regards,
Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
  - From: Steve Meier

References:
- gEDA-user: SOT23
  - From: Matt Ettus
- Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
  - From: Dan McMahill

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread