[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: SOT23

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
From: Dan McMahill <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:39:19 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:40:24 -0500
In-reply-to: <ad9f7823050111001457cdb802@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ad9f7823050111001457cdb802@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 12:14:40AM -0800, Matt Ettus wrote:
> Is there a SOT23-5 footprint somewhere in PCB?  And does anyone have a
> mapping between SOTxx and SCxx numbers?
> 

There are some SOT and SC footprints in ~geda.  Especially with these,
you really really really (I can't stress it enough) want to verify
the footprint before using them.  This is because I know of at least
2 different ways the pins on a SOT23-3 are numbered by different 
vendors.

-Dan

--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
  - From: Daniel J Wisehart

References:
- gEDA-user: SOT23
  - From: Matt Ettus

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Next by Author: gEDA-user: netlist comparison tool?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: SOT23
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread