[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: libgdgeda different number

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: libgdgeda different number
From: Ales Hvezda <ahvezda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:59:23 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:00:13 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:34:11 GMT." <20050117073411.GA279@beton.cybernet.src> ------
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

>Why libgdgeda is 2.0.15 and the rest of geda is 20041228?
>Wouldn't it be possible to have all them 20041228?
>

	Because libgdgeda is not a core component of gaf, it is an 
optional library which tries to follow libgd to some minimal degree.

								-Ales

References:
- gEDA-user: libgdgeda different number
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Suggested removal of http://bach.ece.jhu.edu/~haceaton/pcb/
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: single gEDA tarball
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: libgdgeda different number
Next by thread: gEDA-user: Mangling schematics
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread