[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability
From: Xtian Xultz <xultz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:45:26 -0200
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:45:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050119192639.GE7537@beton.cybernet.src>
Organization: AXC Inc.
References: <20050119184128.GA6403@beton.cybernet.src> <41EEAE9F.6070104@bellsouth.net> <20050119192639.GE7537@beton.cybernet.src>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6.1

Em Qua 19 Jan 2005 17:26, Karel Kulhavy escreveu:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:01:51PM -0600, Bert Douglas wrote:
> > The way that you guarrantee contact reliability is by forcing current to
> > flow, every time the contact points are moved.  This causes microscopic
> > welds.
>
> But when I have 10Mhz broadband signals with 700mVpp amplitude I probably
> can't weld them together. Or is there some trick even for this situation?
>
> Cl

Clamping the signal...

References:
- gEDA-user: Contact reliability
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability
  - From: Bert Douglas
- Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: spdt, spst
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Usability question
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Contact reliability
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread