[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:54:07 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:54:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <20060106153528.GA10935@kestrel> (message from Karel Kulhavy on Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:35:28 +0100)
References: <20060105193228.908DB2AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <200601060203.k0623vTO031230@envy.delorie.com> <20060106110452.GA30408@kestrel> <200601061412.k06EC9p3021989@envy.delorie.com> <20060106153528.GA10935@kestrel>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> I suggest it to be W and not W/2. Then the width "bump" would be 0.

I wasn't describing a change.  I was describing the way it already
happens to work.

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
  - From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: polygon problem
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: trace calculation
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread