[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
RE: gEDA-user: wont be watching list :(
- To: <geda-user@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: gEDA-user: wont be watching list :(
- From: "Robert Thorpe" <Robert.Thorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:54:02 -0000
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:53:54 -0500
- Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcYcn+w/2P7aQXvaR72Sy+o2+gHg0QANc8aQ
- Thread-topic: gEDA-user: wont be watching list :(
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Samuel A. Falvo II
> Sent: 19 January 2006 02:25
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: wont be watching list :([Scanned]
>
> On 1/18/06, Dave McGuire <mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > "Legacy" PICs? Is Microchip phasing out the PIC family?
>
> Doubtful, but perhaps he's referring to the PIC's patently
> older architecture versus the much more modern Atmel
> processors. Like NE2000 -- it's legacy, but it's still in
> regular production without any signs of stopping soon.
Some members of the PIC family are considered legacy/deprecated, because
there are similar versions that have been improved upon.