[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Unconnected pins and missing sub-parts
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Related to multiple subpart devices like FPGA or OpAmp with separate
> power pins a "SubParts" attribute may be useful, like
>
> "SubParts=Bank0, Bank1, Power"
>
> indicating that a part consists of multiple sub-symbols, so that
> gschem/gnetlist can verify that all sub-parts are present.
This is a good idea because it allows us to keep the current "I'm not
going to second guess the designer" behavior, while giving gnetlist a
way to check if the designer has provided the necessary information.
Gives the designer a way to say "there should be only one of these",
too.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user