[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Parts Manager Working Document

> Rather than having a component "class", explicitly subclassed in the
> database to contain resistor specific attributes, I would do it similar
> to the following:
>
> 1 "component class" / table, one size fits all. Each has a component ID.

The Component ID is what I list on BOM.

> 1 "attribute type class" / table, one size fits all (?)
>
> An entry might be:
>
> Attr_id            213

... Seems to me like we are starting (re)invent an ERP system.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user