Re: gEDA-user: Draft Licence for Open Source Hardware published (OT)

[Dave McGuire <mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/14/10 10:51 PM, timecop wrote:
>> I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive.  I'd like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement is that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need to be in open, documented formats.
> 
> Keep dreaming, bro.
> Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel.

  Damn, and here I was hoping he had unsubscribed.

  Go design a circuit or something, if you can.  Use Protel, so maybe
you'll get something done, huh?

        -Dave
        ...most decidedly having a "zero asshole tolerance" day

-- 
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user