[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Draft Licence for Open Source Hardware published (OT)
> I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive. I'd like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement is that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need to be in open, documented formats.
Keep dreaming, bro.
Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel.
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user