Re: gEDA-user: Draft Licence for Open Source Hardware published (OT)

[Armin Faltl <armin.faltl@xxxxxx>]

Man, what are you doing here?
Read up and steal ideas to incorporate in proprietary tools?
Try snatch bits of wisdome to patent denying prior art?

timecop wrote:
> > I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive.  I'd like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement is that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need to be in open, documented formats.
> >     
>
> Keep dreaming, bro.
> Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>   


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user