Re: gEDA-user: Draft Licence for Open Source Hardware published (OT)

[Dave McGuire <mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

  He's a troll.

         -Dave

On 7/15/10 8:18 AM, Armin Faltl wrote:
> Man, what are you doing here?
> Read up and steal ideas to incorporate in proprietary tools?
> Try snatch bits of wisdome to patent denying prior art?
> 
> timecop wrote:
>>> I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual
>>> *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to
>>> restrictive.  I'd like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW
>>> license where a requirement is that the design files for the
>>> project-- and its derivative works --need to be in open, documented
>>> formats.
>>>     
>>
>> Keep dreaming, bro.
>> Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geda-user mailing list
>> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>
>>   
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


-- 
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user